[ad_1]
According to Variety, his work will be presented at the Louvre courtesy of Superchief Gallery NFT and will premiere March 21. can I tell you a secret,” which will be a series of 100 pieces created with AI.
However, Silver’s announcement was immediately met with skepticism online from members of the traditional art space – some suggesting the exhibition would most likely be held in the Carrousel du Louvre, an underground shopping center located near the Louvre museum, while others viciously implied that Silver had deceived by unrealistic expectations.
On Friday, March 10, the Louvre confirmed that Silver would not be exhibiting there, leading to an outpouring of support for Silver by disillusioned NFT fans who questioned how such an embarrassing mess came about.
Miscommunication case?
When the Louvre finally straightened out, Silver was released (and scrapped soon after) his version of events. Later, he tweeted that he was “not sure who misinterpreted something”.
“They told us Paris Blockchain Week had leased (“privatized”) the Louvre Museum. They said the Louvre Museum has an event rental area, for conferences, and they were very pleased that we had come as their “Art Partner,” Superchief Gallery said in a statement.
Shortly thereafter, Superchief Gallery said its representatives called Silver to break the news. The gallery argued that Paris Blockchain Week “does not represent the details and facts of that meeting, or any of the meetings we had afterward,” only to learn of the turmoil on Twitter after the story about the Silver exhibit went viral.
Superchief Gallery claims in its statement that Paris Blockchain Week holds too much promise. In the end, the gallery decided to cancel its participation in the event completely.
Paris Blockchain Week shares a different version of the event. The organizer notifies CoinDesk that the location of the event is clearly stated in the title and the text of the contract they provide. CoinDesk can view the contract via Zoom to verify.
“It is not in our interest to try to mislead in any way,” the organizers said.
The team said that in planning the details of the showroom they did not speak directly to Silver.
“We never heard of him. And he never heard of us,” they said, adding that in light of the accident, they had recently connected with Silver and offered to work together next year.
They shared that while the large conference was being held at the Carrousel du Louvre, a fact spread in their digital marketing materials, they were planning to have a private VIP dinner inside the Louvre museum, although they said this had never been discussed before. with Silver or a third party managing agent on its behalf. They confirmed that organizing the event came with “very strict rules” and that they “regarded” the images and text used to promote the event.
Messages reviewed by CoinDesk show representatives for Paris Blockchain Week discussing a private VIP event inside the Louvre museum days after Silver shared news about the fair.
“It was only after the Louvre contacted Claire that the agency began discussions about how Claire’s art could be displayed at any point that could be presumed to be inside the Louvre museum – out of desperation. We are looking for a solution to try to accommodate, but without full knowledge of the promise made to Claire by the agent.
A spokesman for global talent agency William Morris Endeavor (WME), which represents Silver, to Variety in a statement that “unfortunately a third party misrepresented the details of this opportunity to our client Claire Silver. We fully support Claire and trust that she acted with integrity throughout this process.”
It is unclear whether the miscommunication occurred at some point during the negotiation process. The initial, informal conversation about the opportunity occurred at another event in Paris last month. However, a formal contract was only signed between the two parties after Silver’s public announcement was made.
In the end, it appears that neither Paris Blockchain Week nor Superchief Gallery intend to deliberately deceive Silver or the public. Neither side would benefit in the long run by lying about something so easily disproved, only to damage Silver’s esteemed reputation in the art world.
Many on social media have defended Silver, noting that complex dynamics involving artists, agents, galleries, brokers and museums often exist. In the end, it seems that artists bear the brunt of the reactions to perceived failure, regardless of who else is involved or what goes on behind the scenes.
“Gallery success is measured by the success of its artists, and artists’ success is determined by a complex measure of support: What important museum exhibitions have they been involved in? Which two years? Have the right collectors caught on? wrote ARTNews in 2020.
Claire told CoinDesk that she had taken a step back from the situation to protect her health.
“I am far from my depth and have erased myself. Something went wrong at every level, and I was naive and flew too close to the sun to catch the trouble myself.
He explained that he had reason to believe the exhibition at the Louvre was legitimate – he noted that the Louvre was closed to the public on Tuesday and the proposed exhibition would be held on Tuesday. “I’ve seen artists use museums as backdrops for music videos, etc., so it made sense for me to have an exhibition on Tuesday,” he says.
In the end, he said he did not blame any of the parties involved for the accident. “I respect what [Paris Blockchain Week] not for digital artists, and eager to exhibit at [Carrousel du Louvre] if it’s in another context. I also deeply respect and am immensely grateful to Superchief for fighting harder for AI collaborative artists than anyone else in space.”
[ad_2]
Source link
